Actually – no, I don’t. I do see someone who asks a lot of questions, but then can’t seem to answer any sent their way. And someone who thinks that constructive criticism is saying “But you seem very narrow minded and sort of full of your self.” and “You seem like an angry guy
What’s a matter, don’t get laid (at all) enough?”

“It must be nice to live a double-standard.”

Coming from someone who sees none of any Repugnicant Party members’ flaws and all of any Democrat’s, that last statement is pretty much the definition of irony.

Taken any hostages today? Or do you just let others do your dirty work for you?

Remember that you instigated the name calling in the first place?

It must be nice to live a double-standard.

It’s like you’re reading from the manual…

Here, monkey -

Have

A

Banana.

Nice of you to tell me why I am putting my opinions up here. How long have you had this amazing ability to determine what others are thinking? Or perhaps you are putting words in their mouths?

No trust fund here. Got through school by borrowing a little from the ‘rents and paid it all off on my own. Just because the norm in your world is to sponge off your parents, don’t try and make it the norm in mine…

As for being narrow-minded and full of myself: maybe you should get a mirror and take a good look in there. You should see all of the things you find fault with in others if you look hard enough…

What I choose to do with my time is my business. I appreciate the suggestions, but I would give you a suggestion of my own on what you can do with them.

Thanks for admitting that trying to show you the error of your ways is a waste of time. FReepertrash tend to be unable to keep more than one coherent thought in their melons at a time. At least you’re big enough to admit that.

I notice that you seem unable to defend your opinions rationally, and tend to resort to name calling once your points of view are shown to be the mindless prattle coming from Faux News. Also straight from the Repugnicant playbook, I’m afraid…

Smarter ditto monkeys, please…

You’re sowing confusion in the ranks of the progressives who come here, mainly by spewing the standard Repug propaganda.

I have shamelessly self-promoted. Maybe even here. But that is not my purpose when responding to your comments.

And, no, you are definitely not doing any promotional work on my behalf. Even if that is your purpose with these comments.

Of course I have an agenda. Everybody does, including you and the host of this site. What point are you trying to make here?

If you want an agenda, head over to the Free Republic. Or Little Green Footballs, or Emperor Misha’s zone, or any one of the countless other shills for the current junta occupying the White House.

And by all means keep on showing us how foolish the Repugnicant point of view is. And how the Repugs try and seem to be fair when in fact they are pushing their own nefarious schemes.

For example : “Don’t you suppose that the truth is revealed between the lines of two arguments from opposing views?”

Not if the arguments are coming from Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reilly. Are you suggesting that the truth is somewhere in beween those two (who often disparage each other’s points of view)? Somewhere between my views and those of Marc Perkel? Or are you trying to suggest that we should treat Marc’s opinions as being as truthful (or as far removed from the middle of the road viewpoint) as those of Rush? Any of these methods primarily accomplish one thing: they move the line defining the middle of the road. Which is what it appears to me that you are doing with this statement.

But you already knew that. and it wouldn’t fit in with bashing all Dems all the time – so it was conveniently omitted from the discussion.

What kind of an agenda are you pushing for your conservative masters this time?