Bush did not win Florida

This post was written by marc on August 10, 2004
Posted Under: Politics

Just to clear things up once and for all – Bush did not win Florida. Neither did Gore. Nobody won the election in Florida. What happened is that the Supreme Court in a Supreme act of Treason to the Constitution stopped the election process and without any constitional authority to do so – appointed Bush the president.

We can argue forever who might have won the election had the process not been terminated by the Supreme Court but that doesn’t matter. What matters is that we at least tell it the way it is – and the way it is is – Bush didn’t win. The Supreme Court stole the election for Bush. And for those of you who claim “Bush would have won anyhow”, even if that were true – it doesn’t matter. He didn’t win. He was not elected president – he was appointed president. Bush did not win Florida.

I keep seeing the press make statements that Bush won Florida by 537 votes when the reality is that he didn’t. Bush won by only one vote – 5-4 in the Supreme Court who stopped the election process and substituted it with their own election.

Reader Comments

>>>…press make statements that Bush won Florida by 537 votes <<<<

Well, that’s east to counteract – start making statemnents of your own.

Let’s start the story floating around that Gore won Florida by 862 votes….or 923 votes! Paste phoney links to the comments in support of it and do what the Neocon’s do. If you tell a lie long enough, it becomes the truth. Look at how well that worked for religion! What the heck. Lies are lies right?

Complaining about it does no good. Fight fire with fire.

#1 
Written By osiris on August 10th, 2004 @ 10:20 am

You could not be more wrong. Bush won the count, he won the recount, and he won the rerecount. There was not a single count that he lost. Having been a candidate yourself, as I was (twice), you know that the state has to spell out the rules for every election. Once those rules are spelled out, they must be lived by. The state of Florida pick the day that the vote count had to be submitted. When that date came they had two COMPLETE counts, and Bush won both of them. The state of Florida tried to change the rules hoping that Gore would win the third count.

Now, who was running Gore’s recount? A guy from Chicago, the son of the late Richard J. Daley … and you want to talk about stealing an election. I was born and raised in Chicago, I’ll tell you about stealing elections.

The real story is … Daley tried to steal the election for Gore, and the United States Supreme Court stopped him from doing it.

#2 
Written By X-FREERER on August 10th, 2004 @ 10:59 am

X-freeper you boggle my mind, Marc just said that no-one won florida, freeper you are also forgetting to add all the blacks and hispanics that were forced from the polls so they couldn’t vote. Don’t you remember the hanging chad problem, and the accidental voting. Those Jewish grandmothers couldn’t put there finger in the right hole. And if anything it was bush who stole the election, bush’s cousin runs fox news, and they were the first bunch to say that bush won that night, prompting other news channels to change to that conclusion. Bush also has a statefull of money, so at anypoint he could have baught out the supreme court, just like he baught his way into the national gaurd, and threw yale.

#3 
Written By Joshua Gillogly on August 10th, 2004 @ 4:18 pm

Somehow what I posted here got filed under “Man who videos own beheading speaks out!” Weird, wild, wacky stuff.

So, to maintain consistency in my disorientation, let me say the “beheading” video was the cheesiest bit of fakery I’ve seen in awhile.

Incredible they would think it was real. Neocon=dumbass.

#4 
Written By Phil Thompson on August 10th, 2004 @ 7:03 pm

More FReepertrash spewage. You can take the ‘x’ off that name, ditto monkey.

How convenient that you forget – when elections finish that close in Florida, recounts are MANDATED by the rules. When the Chimperor and his minions flew in a bunch of Repugnicants from all over the country to participate in the Brooks Brothers riot and STOP THE LEGALLY MANDATED recount, it was in violation of the rules. When the Supremem Court decides that we can’t find out who really won, because the decision ‘might hurt the reputation’ of BabyDoc Bush, they are INSTALLING an UNELECTED leader.

The real story is how the junta stole the elction last time. Marc was trying to move beyond that, and you just brought it back to the debate table again. Worse, you tried to spin the Repugnicant lies about what really happened AGAIN. Open your eyes and get your head out of Bush’s crotch. Maybe if you Cheneytards would learn to play by the rules, the rest of us might learn to trust what you say (after thoroughly checking it out to make sure it’s true) in about fifty years.

And, Marc’s right. Nobody won Florida. Their electoral votes were given to BabyDoc Bush so that he could be installed in the White House. No amount of FReepertrash BS can change the facts.

And every recount but one found that Florida was won by Gore. Maybe you can get your Repugnicant masters to rewrite the history books, and then get the media whores to drill it into the American mindset, but you still cannot hide the truth that pRezNit Prozac was installed against the wishes of the American people.

Now, go be a good ditto monkey, and go Cheney yourself!

#5 
Written By (: Tom :) on August 11th, 2004 @ 7:57 am

Tom and Josh, you both are clueless. From Josh not knowing how to spell bought (baught) and Tom talking about dimpled chads and mandated recounts. You can both eat the the dimple chad hanging from my arse. Recounts are mandated in Florida, and the first recount had Bush as the winner. Mandate satisfied. The same laws states that it must be done before a certain date. And people who spell like Josh probably count just as bad.

Blacks and Hispanics were chased from the polls. Yeah, right, old white republicans were in the ghettos scaring blacks away. Give me a break.

Gore said that the ballots were SO confusing that ALL the old Jewish women that voted for Buchanan actually meant to vote for Gore. Being an if/then guy I would conclude that every old Jewish woman who voted for Gore really meant to vote for Buchanan, which means it was a bigger loss for Gore.

Any way you slice it, the “Gore-people” are SORE LOSERS!

#6 
Written By X-FREEPER on August 11th, 2004 @ 10:25 am

couldn’t have said it better myself tom…

#7 
Written By charlie chingas on August 11th, 2004 @ 10:30 am

It doesn’t take a formal education in linguistics to realize the American term “loser” means much more than someone who loses. “Loser,” as it applies in contemporary American culture, is much more than the literal term “loser.” Picture two teenagers giving each other a hard time, and one denigrates the other with a concise utterance of one word: “loser.” Frames a big “L” on his forehead, etc.

As a derogatory piece of the American idiom-scape, this term “loser” denotes a person who’s lost the will to win; someone *so* accustomed to losing that he barely reacts when he loses. For him, losing is as natural a part of life as breathing. He has become the act of *losing* and is therefore the very personification of that dreaded American epithet “loser.”

If the Democrats were losers in this sense of the word, they’d have accepted the Bush “victory” a long time ago. Oh sure, a few Democrats *have* accepted it, as they apparently scamper away from the truth if its revelation becomes a tiny bit challenging. These guys are, unfortunately, *losers* in every sense of the word. But the majority of us know better. And we’re not going away anytime soon.

People who remind the nation how Bush stole Florida are anything *but* losers. “Sore,” perhaps, but “losers”? Hardly.

If you think people who feel victimized are helpless, just wait till you see Florida’s results this fall.

#8 
Written By Phil Thompson on August 11th, 2004 @ 11:53 am

Freeper, please don’t fit into all the other republicans ass’s please, The next time on these comments I hear one of them talk about bad spelling, they need to be be buttfucked by a billygoat.

Freeper It’s apparent you know nothing about politics and this subject, you just hear what the media wants you to hear, Yes blacks were refused to vote, police kept them from getting inside the polls.

Buchanan is a republican, hince no Jewish women would vote for him, he even said he didn’t deserve half of the votes he got because he knew they voted wrong.

#9 
Written By Joshua Gillogly on August 11th, 2004 @ 1:59 pm

WTF??? My last comment was directed to Tom not X-Freeper. And freeper, and all other who do this: if your only retort is to point out sumones speling, then go chanie yoreself…

#10 
Written By charlie chingas on August 11th, 2004 @ 3:27 pm

I believe the chickens will come home to roost and the shrubbush will get his comeuppance. And the xfreeper and freepers will get their heads up in the sunshine and smell the coffee. Four more years of bush would send this country into a depression worse than the 1929 one.

#11 
Written By OldLadyfrom Wyoming on August 11th, 2004 @ 4:59 pm

X-Freeper, asleep at the wheel….

#12 
Written By OrangeALert on August 11th, 2004 @ 6:00 pm

Where was all that stuff about dimpled chads in my comment again? Oh, that’s right – it’s in the same place as the facts are with this ditto monkey: anywhere but his overripe melon.

And, thanks charlie for your comment. I didn’t see how anyone else was flaming you, they can’t stand FReepertrash ditto monkey hypocrites who flash Republic talking points into the comments of any liberal web site coming close to the truth around here. Judging from the stimulating arguments and verifiable facts (cough) they don’t use when they comment here, this piece of human pond scum deserves everything he’s getting. Some of us won’t put up with the dissemination of Republic dren anymore.

How does the world smell when your head is up Bush’s ass, X-conscience?

#13 
Written By (: Tom :) on August 12th, 2004 @ 6:22 am

Josh and Tom, what is with all of the name calling. You guys have to curb your hatred for people who point out your ignorance. I am a registered Democrat. You guys mentioned the hanging chad, not me. Why is it that when liberals are hit in the face with the truth, their lack of defense causes them to start calling names? Does it make one feel better.

Do you really think that Bush lost the last election? You want to see a loss, just watch John Kerry. I do not think that he has an ice cubes chance in hell of beating Bush. I took all of the name calling out of your post and you basically said NOTHING. So that is all I can respond to. Come back with some substance.

If you want to blame Bush, or Clinton (no, he only gets credit), Bush I, or Reagan for the economy neither one of you understands the Federal Reserve Bank, the US Treasury, and money. And your lack of simpler knowledge makes it impossible for me to teach you. Continue to be the “Sore-fools” that you are.

#14 
Written By X-FREEPER on August 12th, 2004 @ 7:33 am

Aww, the classic, turn-it-around-and-make-it-look-bad-for-them. freeper, before you start bulging in your pants, every poll in the news media has Kerry and Bush tied, Every poll out of the news media that has moderate veiws shows kerry ahead, take AOL for example.

http://www.electionguide04.com/straw_poll.adp

I really dont care what the “Federal Reserve Bank, the US Treasury, and money” All i know is when we had clinton we had a surplus, jobs, and a great economy, when we had reagon, bush sr. and so far bush jr. we had a deficit.

#15 
Written By Joshua Gillogly on August 12th, 2004 @ 11:25 am

M. Willis, that’s an interesting page. I just registered and pledged my vote (for Kerry). The Electoral College projection looks pretty close.

X-FREEPER, I agree with you about the role of the Federal Reserve Bank and US Treasury. That has a lot more to do with the economy than whoever is sitting in the Oval Office.

#16 
Written By MadBlue on August 13th, 2004 @ 10:55 pm

MAD BLUE you show yourself to be a little more educated than JOSHUA DOWN ON THE FARM. Those farmers still think that we had a surplus. Do they still think they are going to get $9.00 for their soybeans and $3.45 for their corn.

Joshua if you do not care about the FEDERAL RESERVE, but care about who our resident is. You are in the process of causing yourself and your fellow countrymen a lot more pain. Please, go educate yourself.

#17 
Written By THE TRUTH on August 17th, 2004 @ 6:43 am

Add a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.