<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buy one, get one free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marc.perkel.com/2007/01/20/buy-one-get-one-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marc.perkel.com/2007/01/20/buy-one-get-one-free/</link>
	<description>Marc Perkel is the most dangerous mind on the Internet</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Charron</title>
		<link>http://marc.perkel.com/2007/01/20/buy-one-get-one-free/#comment-5016</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Charron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 01:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perkel.com/wp/?p=910#comment-5016</guid>
		<description>China? Why is it that everyone wants war with China. China wouldn't use bombs against the United States. They have always sought peaceful negotiations in the UN, unlike the warmongering United States. China right now is a great friend to us, and after all we do love their money... 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China? Why is it that everyone wants war with China. China wouldn&#8217;t use bombs against the United States. They have always sought peaceful negotiations in the UN, unlike the warmongering United States. China right now is a great friend to us, and after all we do love their money&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anthony</title>
		<link>http://marc.perkel.com/2007/01/20/buy-one-get-one-free/#comment-5015</link>
		<dc:creator>anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 06:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perkel.com/wp/?p=910#comment-5015</guid>
		<description>Maybe the debate will be about how much more critical national security missile technology the Clinton's can sell to China.  

The technology that they will use against use in the future.  

Thanks Bill Clinton, you white trash pandering hillbilly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the debate will be about how much more critical national security missile technology the Clinton&#8217;s can sell to China.  </p>
<p>The technology that they will use against use in the future.  </p>
<p>Thanks Bill Clinton, you white trash pandering hillbilly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
