Obama win in South Carolina might hurt him in the long run

This post was written by marc on January 28, 2008
Posted Under: Letters to the Editor

Letter to the Editor

Yes it is true that Obama routed Clinton in South Carolina, but at what cost? Obama had been running as a race neutral candidate up until Sounth Carolina where he, not the Clintons, injected race into the campaign. Obama won the black vote by painting Bill Clinton as a racist. But out here in the real world we all know that Bill Clinton is not a racist and a lot of us Bill Clinton supporters are highly offended by what Obama did in South Carolina.

The bottom line is that of all the candidates in both parties it is a fact that Barak Obama has the shortest resume. For Democrats to put forth the candidate with the shortest resume who falsely accuses Bill Clinton of being a racist would be a serious mistake. Bill Clinton was the best president in my lifetime and I find Obama’s tactics very offensive.


I’m getting tired of the white guilt crap and I’m not going to buy into it. When blacks are overtly racist and whites are supposed to shut up and take it – I’m not going to buy into it. I am not going to give Obama political welfare by making an affirmative action vote. Think about it. If Hillary as a woman showed up to run for president with no resume would we even consider her? She’d be laughed at.

Obama supporters who call Bill Clinton a racist are in fact themselves racist. Bill Clinton was knows as “America’s first black president” and the reason for that is that he took care of black people like no one in the history of the United States. So this calling Clinton a racist is bullshit.

Add a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.