As Stewart said, they like to inflame people and they make money from an America that is fighting itself. But let’s look at it in more detail.

The news media picked Bush as president. The anti-Gore bias was overwhelming. Especially during the recount.

The worked hard selling us on the Iraq war. If 25 right wingers rallied they got covered. If 100k of us rallied they didn’t cover it. As with the Stewart rally, as he pointed out, 5 major networks weren’t there. They were all there for Glenn Beck.

The Tea Party was created by the news media. Sarah Palin would have been forgotten as quickly as Geraldine Ferraro if not for the news media keeping her alive.

But a name almost never spoken anymore – Bush. And he’s the one who caused this mess.

Now they are selling us on the idea that Democrats are going to lose Tuesday. And it’s all media created bullshit!

You’ll notice that they are not only all on the same script, but they even use the same phrases. “Republican Tsunami”.

The media is a corporation. When a money interest wants news slanted a certain way they get the producers to tell the talent, usually large breasted women, what they script for the day is. And that’s the slant they put on it. That is also why they all use the same phrasing.

Stewart got it exactly right. And when you think about it – why is the most trusted name in news a comedian? Is it because the pundits are really that stupid? Or is it because it’s money that is talking?

Additionally I am looking for personal information on members of Congress regarding their personal credit card spending. Since Congress is now trying to require that credit card companies turn over your purchase records to the government I think it’s time that we spy on them to see where members of Congress are spending their personal money.

This sort of spying is outrageous. I am in stunned disbelief that members of Congress would even consider such a law. It is as if they are wiping their asses with the Bill of Rights. I don’t know any other way to get their attention other than having it happen to them so they can know what it’s like to be spied on. So even if this is illegal sometime it is necessary to break the law in order to restore the law. If they are going to let the telecoms to break the law then why can’t we do it?

When the president breaks the law he should be impeached rather than having Congress retroactively bless his illegal acts. This decision sends a message to future presidents that if you break the law then Congress will cover up for you. It also sends a message to big corporations that if the President and members of Congress asks them to conspire with them to break the law that they will receive immunity. This encourages corporations to break the law and them rewards law breaking.

Besides covering up the wrongdoing of the President it also covers up the wrongdoing of members of Congress who knew Bush was breaking the law and conspired with him through their silence. These members are complicit in acts of treason to the Constitution and they are just protecting their own asses in this immunity bill.

If you have the personal cell phone numbers of members of Congress please forward them to me so that we can contact them directly about what we think about them selling out our freedoms.

Furthermore Congress is working on a new bill requiring credit card companies to turn over your purchasing records to the government. So in order to make Congress feel our pain I’m asking The People to dig through the trash of members of Congress and publish their credit card information.

I think they should pass a law requiring anyone who is going to run for Congress pass a written test to see if they actually read and understand what the Constitution says. How can they swear to uphold the Constitution if they haven’t even read it?

As the founder of and member of the Church of Reality I’m claiming a religious exemption from federal law on the basis of our sacred religious principles under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). Government spying on our church members violates our Sacred Principle of Personal Privacy and under our Principle of Activism we have to take a stand on this issue.

By CALVIN WOODWARD, [Moron] Associated Press Writer Tue May 27, 5:25 AM ET

WASHINGTON – There’s been a Clinton running for the White House or living in it for approximately forever. Bill, it could be said, was born to run. Running became Hillary’s destiny, too.

One quarter of Americans have never known life without a Clinton trying for or having the presidency. Millions have gone from diapers to diplomas in the time of the Clintons. [Diapers to diplomas in 8 years?]

When Hillary Rodham Clinton finally exits the 2008 Democratic presidential race, she will end a decades-long, power-couple streak of unique political energy, savvy ideas, colossal policy flops and raw ambition dressed in pants suits and briefs, not boxers. [Sexual Reference]

“Every day is an adventure,” Bill said cheerfully at the start of it all. And how.

By now, the Clintons have been assigned mystical qualities of perseverance. The notion that the adventure is over is almost beyond comprehension.

“I never quit,” she says. “I never give up.”

Even in defeat, Hillary Clinton has made history as the first woman favored for a major party presidential nomination – the first with a real shot at the presidency.

She’s gotten more than 17 million votes in her own right this year, enticingly close to the number won by Barack Obama, who is making history, too, because he’s black.

With her cachet, not to mention her job in the Senate, Clinton won’t drift far from the nation’s consciousness. (Nor is Bill likely to get out of the country’s face.)

“Whatever else you might say about them, they have contributed to substantive dialogue and policy,” says Mary Matalin, a Clinton-era Republican strategist. “Hats off to them substantively.

“They’re really kind of giants in this world.”

In the 2012 and 2016 presidential campaign years, Hillary Clinton, now 60, will still be younger than the Republican candidate, John McCain, is now. Meantime, she could become a powerhouse senator in the manner of the stricken Edward M. Kennedy. Or a Supreme Court justice. Or Obama’s running mate.

Soon, though, there will be no Clinton running for president or about to. Imagine that.

___

Clinton I:

Dial back to Bill Clinton’s two terms and a few big achievements and various smaller ones stand out: unsurpassed economic growth, a balanced budget, welfare reform, free trade, a Middle East peace agreement, gun control, more money for police on the street, the first Cabinet without white men in the majority.

Here was a man who could wear people out talking about the fine points of policy while owning up to his choice of underwear.

Another legacy was the transcendent His and Hers failure: universal health care. The complex, secretively drawn plan to achieve that goal was sent to and killed by a Democratic Congress, no less. [Failure of Congress - not Hillary]

And there were the scandals, His and Hers.

They are known, in brief, as: Monica Lewinsky, Paula Jones, Gennifer Flowers, [More sexual references] Whitewater, the White House travel office firings, White House coffees and Lincoln bedroom stays for donors, FBI background files on Republicans, missing documents [List of scandals that turned out to be not true] and the presidential pardon of a fugitive friend.

The episodes involving women were his. [Another sexual reference] Most of the others were theirs or hers.

___

Scene from a ‘funeral’:

In January 2001, shortly before George W. Bush was sworn in, some of the Clintons’ fiercest critics from the right gathered in a Washington hotel to feast on filet mignon, salmon and sour grapes.

“It’s our way of celebrating the fumigation of Washington,” said L. Brent Bozell III, host of the “funeral” for the Clinton years.

“I’ve never seen a back I’ve found more attractive,” said Robert Bork, the scuttled Supreme Court nominee, meaning Bill Clinton’s back when he left town.

Bozell amended the Lord’s Prayer to say of Mrs. Clinton: “Her socialist agenda got runneth over.” And the Rev. Jerry Falwell gave the invocation, thanking God “a new wind is blowing.”

They seemed to be forgetting someone.

Hillary Clinton came blowing into the Senate chamber, the newly minted junior senator from New York.

___

Clinton II:

She was diligent from the start, attentive to constituent needs and a hard worker on the Armed Services Committee. She promised to be “pretty New York-centric,” and was.

But everything she did was colored by the expectation of a presidential run.

The most polarizing woman in politics turned into a workhorse and formed surprising alliances with Republicans.

She edged toward the center and attempted to accomplish in little pieces what she could not pull off as a whole in her years as first lady.

Clinton joined Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, an architect of her husband’s impeachment, in a law improving health coverage for members of the National Reserve and Guard serving in Iraq.

She pushed for tighter regulation of prescription drugs for children and help for recovery workers whose health was impaired by laboring at the site of the 2001 World Trade Center terrorist attack.

And she voted to authorize the Iraq invasion, which she would never live down after she cruised to re-election in 2006.

No monumental law bears her name.

But in the campaign, universal health care returned to her agenda. This time, she said, she would learn from her experience and do it right – more openly and less intrusively on parts of the health care system that work.

Clinton was the one to beat out of the gate. Everyone knew her, for one thing.

“Ninety-nine percent of the country feels they have a relationship with her,” said Mike McCurry, former press secretary to President Clinton.

And there was Bill, still in everyone’s face. He stumped for his wife as if possessed. Hillary Clinton flashed him that bright smile on stage through thick and thin.

For some voters, that was one Clinton – or two – too many.

“We’ve had enough of the Clintons,” said Haydon Grubbs, 77, of Shalimar, Fla. “New direction, right?”

Grubbs, a Republican who voted in the past for the “He Clinton,” backed Obama this time.

The “She Clinton” found her own voice.

But, like her husband, she seemed the strongest when her back was against the wall.

As the odds of beating Obama sank into the nearly impossible, she campaigned as if there were some previously undiscovered “third way” to win, just as Bill Clinton had sought a third way to govern between the old politics of left and right.

On Friday, she cited the 1968 Democratic primaries as a reason why she should stay in the race. She mentioned the assassination of Robert Kennedy in June of that year, then apologized for bringing it up.

___

Together, Bill and Hillary Clinton have pulled it out of the fire over and over, going back to 1976, when he bounced back from losing a congressional race two years earlier. He won election as Arkansas attorney general.

Two years after that, at 32, he became the nation’s youngest governor.

Then, defeat in 1980 when he sought a second term. It would be his final election loss, but hardly the last dip in the Clintons’ seemingly endless cycle of failure and renewal.

By the mid-1980s, when he was back in office in Little Rock, Clinton’s name was floating as a Democratic presidential prospect.

He took a pass in 1988. But that year marked one benchmark in the rollout of the Clinton era.

He delivered a speech at the Democratic convention laying out a new orthodoxy that he would bring to the presidential race himself four years later, his activist wife at his side.

The Clintons’ national conversation had begun.

The speech went on for so long that some people wondered if it would ever end.

In a way, it never did. Not until now.

One interesting point. I heard them read a statement from Spocko’s blog on the air. The read Spocko’s copyright content. If you apply the same standards of copyright infringement that they are claiming then they have violated Spocko’s copyright. But it’s not a copyright violation because of fair use laws. Just like it’s not a violation of Spocko to use their stuff because of fair use laws.

I hast a lot of sites that no one else will touch. That’s because I’m legal savvy and lawyers just don’t scare me. I’ve received a number of threats by lawyers to take down free speech sites and unless they have firm lehal grounds I tell them to go screw themselves. I’ve even been sued a few times and in all instances the cases were dismissed and the threatening lawyers had to face the judge for ethics issues. I am a strong supporter of free speech and I don’t like slimeballs like Disney trying to shut down critics.

CNN on the other hand showed all the major polls including their own that has Republicans 20 points behind. They also showed some movement towards Republicans but they didn’t go out of their way to distort the story the way MsNBC did.

Polls are going to show a shift towards Republicans because in spite of the coverage the voting achines are rigged to favor Republicans and these late poll shifts are to provie cover for voter fraud. The only thing Republicans have left is the cheating. But it will be interesting to see how that plays out.

Still waiting for Bush to find an excuse to suspend elections.

Even if he did it – it’s not the most important thing in the news. It’s bigger that 2 wars and everything else in the world? It’s infotainment – not news.