Marc Perkel Rantz

As I recall, the center columns collapsed because the type of insulation on them was not sufficient to protect from the heat of the burning jet fuel, something like 2000 deg F, it simply melted the columns. The kinetic energy of the falling debris was then sufficient to pulverize everything below.

I don't remember all the precise details but this was heavily discussed and explained afterwards.

The buildings were designed to handle a hit of a smaller jet but not that of those that hit.

Remember these were big jets nearly full of fuel.

Anyway I would point you to Carl Sagan's quote "extraordinary claims demand extaordinary evidences".

And Occam's Razor - The simplest explanation is usually the correct one

I know about burning oil based fuels, from working on oil burning boilers. fire was not more then 800 degrees F. If the floors did pancake, shoulden't of got progressivly faster. So I think that whole think look kind of Fishy

someone had a tape somewhere of the WTC owner slipping out an admission at some press conference that tower 7 was deliberately blown up
might have been the "what really happened" folk, so the report may be a little suspect, but...
there was supposed to be some justification that the building was in danger of collapsing, but that just fed the conspiracy theories about the mayor's command centre, etc., all being hid in there somewhere

I have seen cotrolled demolition of large buildings live. And personally all three of the WTC buildings appeared to fall in a very controlled manner. A little hard to believe that peolpe flying two jets into two buildings would make all three buildings fall perfectly in the same manner.

smell fishy?

If the fire from the fuel was so hot, how were people able to stand in the opening after the fire dissapated?

This film has the segment from leaseholder Larry Silverstein's comment, which was made in the PBS documentary "America Rebuilds." The meaning and implications of the remark are hashed over in some detail at http://www.wtc7.net/pullit.html

I don't know enough to evaluate the other claims in the film, but WTC7 seems far and away to be the outstanding indication that something's rotten here.

No one has every brought up the point what would be gained by the three buildings coming down completely. The crashing of the planes into the towers would have been enough to get America pissed off and attack anyone Bush wanted to. Why did they need to be brought down? What was inside Building #7. The film is convincing especially the footage of building #7, But Why?

Steve

WTC7 is the key, the Rosetta Stone, for this whole can of worms. What, precisely, was in there that needed pulverizing?

Ya know, I think the nazicons just firgured we'd all be so burned out by the day's ultratraumatic events that we'd unblinkingly accept the obvious pulling of #7 as just one more bad thing the evildoers did, which, in fact, turned out to be the truth, ironically

Where have you been? This video is old news. Of course building 7 was blown up. It is a simple case of arson and insurance fraud. The whole WTC complex had a new insurance policy that paid Silverstein billions. That is why everything had to come down. Get a copy of 911 in plane site and watch the movie. There are others but this one is the simplest to actually see the hoax not only at New York but especially the Pentagon. Do not depend on comments, words, and articles. LOOK AT THE PICTURES AND SEE WITH YOUR OWN EYES. A picture is worth a million lies!

Gee, you guys haven't seen "Loosechange911"? I have no doubt that all 3 were controlled demolition. What was to gain? Landlord clears $3 billion? Occam's razor doesn't mean the official explanation is real. This is one of the most unbelievable crimes in history, right in your face. Never before or since has a steel-frame building collapsed because of fire. Even if the pancake theory held, these structures would not have fallen straight down at the rate of gravity.
Several experts have spoken up, including a scientist from NIST who said that the steel was certified to their standards, and could not have melted or seriously softened because of an uncontrolled jet fuel (kerosene) fire. It's a world class spectacle, a catalyzing and cataclysmic event, just what PNAC ordered for the BFEE.

"Don't mess with US" is not limited to foreigners. Me thinks we're being hoodwinked. Check the facts, do the research, decide for yourself. Wake up, people! I will not take this anymore. You in?

Dude, I voted for Bush twice and EVEN I have come to the truth of controlled demolition of the towers. Plus the lawn outside the Pentagon looks like a golf course, not a crash scene. And if the Pentagon absorbed the whole plane, where is the outline? Check out Painful Deceptions DVD and Painful Questions book.

My freind sent me a few videos opened my eyes to whats really happing the best i can do is pass on all the info i have to every one i know that is interested i deeply hope that every one has this information so make it a point to

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!PASS IT ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!